Quantcast
Channel: News
Viewing all 1155 articles
Browse latest View live

Making a difference in managing croup

$
0
0
Making a difference in managing croupnowens@cochrane.orgMon, 02/29/2016 - 10:29
Croup: a father's story

For more than 20 years, Cochrane has produced systematic reviews of primary research in human health care and health policy. We are internationally recognized as the highest standard in evidence-based healthcare resources.

This video is the story of how a team of Cochrane researchers in Canada are helping to change practice in the treatment of a common, yet potentially fatal childhood viral infection.

Croup (more formally known as laryngotracheobronchitis) causes swelling in the throat and windpipe and produces a seal-like barking cough and noisy breathing.

In 2011 researchers from the Cochrane Child Health Field, based in Alberta, Canada, were deeply involved in a lot of systematic reviews on child relevant topics. They were looking at ways that they could translate the information from these reviews to different stakeholder groups, such as clinician audiences and parents of sick children.

In the first monthly installment of our new video series, “Cochrane - Making a Difference,” Denise Thomson and Lisa Hartling from Cochrane’s Child Health Field share their story of how their health evidence is making a difference on the emergency frontline in Canada:

 


Cochrane Mid-Year Meeting - London, UK - 4-5 April 2016

$
0
0
Cochrane Mid-Year Meeting - London, UK - 4-5 April 2016mumoquit@cochr…Mon, 02/29/2016 - 13:53
Mid-Year Meeting

Cochrane’s Mid-Year Meeting provides an opportunity for face-to-face meetings of the collaboration’s Steering Group and other groups and contributors responsible for helping to formulate and implement Cochrane policy.

Location: 
King's Fund, 11 Cavendish Square, London, UK
 
 

New Cochrane Community website!

$
0
0
New Cochrane Community website! mumoquit@cochr…Mon, 02/29/2016 - 16:24
New Cochrane Community website!

Time to celebrate - the new Cochrane Community website is here!

We are delighted to welcome you to the new and improved Cochrane Community website - the final phase of rebranding Cochrane online. It's been just over a year since we launched cochrane.org with our new organizational logo and branding; following that, 130+ Cochrane Groups went through the same process. Now we're focusing on this website, to make it a key resource in the work of Cochrane Groups and contributors worldwide.

The Community website has grown organically over the years, and has become increasingly difficult to search and navigate. Groups have been using their external websites to bookmark key pages and resources for their contributors. It is our hope that this will no longer be necessary – although those hyperlinks will still work for the time being. We hope that the new structure will make it easy for you to find the right resources for each stage of the review production process; get a clearer view of the many projects in which the Central Executive team is involved; and access all the resources available to make review production and dissemination easier.

New features:

  • Easy to navigate search: We have consulted with the community to develop a more streamlined navigation. If you can’t find what you’re looking for, try the search feature in the top right or every page.
  • News and blogs in same place: No more switching between different pages to see what's happening across the community! Blogs and News are in the same feed here – just click on the news or blog tag at the end of posts to filter.
  • Quick links: We reviewed analytics to find out what pages were viewed most on the old site. You now have easy access to the top pages from the main landing page on the right-hand side.

The Community site is still a work in progress. We’d love to hear from you about what is missing or edits you may have - please provide your feedback here!

Cochrane contributor: Joan Webster

$
0
0
Cochrane contributor: Joan Webster mumoquit@cochr…Mon, 02/29/2016 - 16:52
Cochrane contributor: Joan Webster

This Cochrane Blog post highlights the contributions of Professor Joan Webster; a prolific author, intrepid adventurer, and much loved mentor to many.

Cross-posted, with permission, from Cochrane Australia.

Conduct a trusty Google search on Professor Joan Webster and there among the myriad of journal articles, research papers, and academic citations, you’ll find a single tweet from a nursing student that reads: ‘It’s official. Prof Joan Webster is a guru…’

This brief pronouncement goes a long way to sum up the shared sentiments of the many students, nurses, and researchers that have worked with or been mentored by Joan over the past few decades. While she would always humbly eschew any such lofty title, her dynamic approach to research translation, patient care, and life in general makes it a fitting one. Her lively interest in learning, teaching, and international adventures with family, friends, and fellow Cochrane contributors reflects a mindset that’s all about the well-being of others. ‘You could say that my research interests are quite eclectic,’ says Joan, ‘but whatever the topic, I’m really all about patient outcomes and using evidence to change clinical practice for the better. This explains why I’m such a passionate advocate for and promoter of Cochrane, which now plays such a central role in my work.’

As Director for Nursing Research at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH), Joan is in a unique position to directly shape clinical research and contribute to its effective translation. ‘It’s a little different from working within a university or research institution,’ she explains. ‘I’m a known and trusted insider here, and I work with nurses at a really grass-roots level to identify research gaps and formulate critical research questions that we go on to answer together. It’s a role I really enjoy.’

Joan was instrumental in introducing an evidence-based practice training program at the RBWH which has proved a great success by any measure. ‘We have a really embedded culture of evidence-based practice here now, and pretty much everyone is involved with Cochrane Reviews as a result,’ says Joan. ‘You can see our nurses are really engaged and get involved every step of the way, from data collection to analysis. I get a huge amount of pleasure from mentoring and see so many nurses go on to develop the confidence and expertise to publish themselves. At certain times I see a light go on in their eyes and it’s so rewarding. I’m really like a proud mother!’ Joan laughs.

There are few better placed to mentor prospective Cochrane contributors than Joan, who over the past 15 years has authored 16 reviews and contributed to the work of seven Review Groups. In recent years, she’s found a very welcome home in the Wounds Group.

‘I met Nicky Cullum and Sally Bell-Syer at the Freiburg Colloquium in 2008,’ Joan says. ‘Before I knew it they’d convinced me to move to York to work with the Wounds Group for a few months. I duly did so and had the most rewarding professional experience of my life. I found a wonderful environment with like-minded people who shared my commitment to research and the effective use of evidence. They were a great group of people and have since become a big part of my life. We email daily, talk often, and meet up before the Cochrane Colloquium to socialise and sightsee in a different city around the globe each year. It’s a real highlight for all of us.’

Coordinating Editor of the Wounds Group Nicky Cullum is equally glad their brief meeting in Freiburg has led to such rewarding professional and personal connections. ‘We love having Joan work with us,’ she says. ‘Apart from being a fun, lovely, and inspirational person to work with, she’s very much in touch with clinical practice and is vital to our group. She’s published research in leading journals including the BMJ and the Lancet and continues to contribute so much to the development of countless other researchers. It’s really rare in nursing to find such a research leader so embedded in clinical practice.’

‘Not only is Joan a guru,’ Nicky concludes, ‘she’s also a legend. I don’t know where we’d be without her so she is not allowed to retire, ever.’ The good news for Cochrane is that with countless review updates, mentoring commitments, and international meetings/adventures on the cards, retirement looks to be completely out of the question for our resident guru Joan Webster for the foreseeable future.

 

Image: (from left) Sally Bell-Syer, Nicky Cullum and Joan Webster enjoying a night out.

Would your Cochrane Group like to tell the community about a beloved contributor? Email mumoquit@cochrane.org

 

Professional or personal – your opinion counts!

$
0
0
Professional or personal – your opinion counts! mumoquit@cochr…Mon, 02/29/2016 - 20:09
Professional or personal – your opinion counts!

Cochrane Tobacco and Addiction is celebrating their 20-year anniversary. In addition to taking this great opportunity to publicize their work, they are also using it to plan how they move forward.

Whether your interest in prevention and treatment of tobacco addiction is personal or professional, Cochrane Tobacco Addiction wants to hear from you!

The first step in their priority setting exercise is a survey for policy makers, healthcare providers and commissioners, smokers, former smokers, researchers and research funders. You can take the survey online.

TAG

You can also find more information on this priority setting process at Cochrane Tobacco Addiction's website.

Core competencies for editors of biomedical journals: scoping review

$
0
0
Core competencies for editors of biomedical journals: scoping reviewnowens@cochrane.orgTue, 03/01/2016 - 04:43
A scoping review published in BMC Medicine identifies core competencies for editors.

A scoping review published in BMC Medicine has identified a range of potential competencies to enable scientific editors of biomedical journals to do their jobs effectively and support high quality in the publication of research. James Galipeau and colleagues at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute in Canada, in part funded by Cochrane, conducted the review as part of a major project to identify consensus on a core set of competencies and establish a training program to support editors in attaining these competencies. A number of Cochrane Editors are contributing to this project during 2016, and Cochrane will be exploring ways to introduce effective training to support our editors as the project continues.

 

Cochrane is looking for a new home for Fertility Regulation reviews

$
0
0
Cochrane is looking for a new home for Fertility Regulation reviewsmumoquit@cochr…Tue, 03/01/2016 - 17:24
Cochrane is looking for a new home for Fertility Regulation reviews

Following the loss of funding in support of their work, Frans and Anja Helmerhorst have decided to retire from their roles as the Coordinating and Managing Editors of the Fertility Regulation Group. We thank them for their contribution to Cochrane over many years and wish them both well in their retirement.

We are therefore looking for a new home for the Fertility Regulation Group: covering systematic reviews of contraception and abortion. The current portfolio of the Group includes 77 completed reviews, 13 published protocols and 4 titles. Information on the work of the group can be found on its website. Carol Manion, who is currently the group’s Trials Search Coordinator is willing to stay on in support of the group.

REQUIREMENTS  

We will accept application from within existing Cochrane groups and beyond, but applicant groups should be aware of the following requirements:

  1. The group should be led by someone who has experience of authoring and editing Cochrane Reviews and also has relevant content expertise,
  2. The group will need to demonstrate that it has secure funding for its activities for at least 3 years, or a high prospect of being able to secure this.
  3. Core members of the team will include one or more lead editor (“Co-ordinating Editor”), Managing Editor (ME) and Trials Search Coordinator (TSC). Both the ME and TSC should either have relevant skills and expertise, or experience of working in these roles within a CRG, or preferably both (see here). 
  4.  The Co-ordinating Editor and her/his institution will be required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Cochrane within the first year of operation, and will need to be able to demonstrate capacity to deliver at least 0.1 FTE availability / week, and preferably more.
  5. The ME and TSC will need to be able to contribute at least 0.5 FTE availability per week each, and should both be funded for their Cochrane activities.
  6. The group will need to develop an editorial board, but current members of the board may be willing to continue in the role, on request (see here).

Guidance on setting up a CRG can be found in the Cochrane Organisational Policy Manual but please note that this content is currently being updated.

Potential applicants should familiarise themselves with Cochrane’s commercial sponsorship and conflict of interest policies.

Individuals or groups who are interested to explore this are welcome to speak with Frans Helmerhorst, outgoing Co-ordinating Editor or David Tovey, Editor in Chief.

APPLICATIONS

Full deciption and appendix of current core activities of a CRG here.

To apply please send a cover letter detailing the responses to the numbered bullet points above, and a short Curriculum Vitae of prospective Co-ordinating Editors, Managing Editors and Trials Search Coordinators to David Tovey.

The closing date for applications is 22nd April 2016.

 

Seoul Colloquium call for abstracts and workshops now open

$
0
0
Seoul Colloquium call for abstracts and workshops now opennowens@cochrane.orgThu, 03/03/2016 - 01:10
Seoul Colloquium call for abstracts and workshops now open

It’s time to write up those research projects and tell the world about all the exciting things you’ve been doing. The call for abstracts and workshops for this year’s Cochrane Colloquium in Seoul is now open. We invite submissions on a wide range of topics relating to systematic reviews, evidence synthesis, evidence-based health care, and the work of Cochrane. The submission deadline is Wednesday 13 April.

View the call for abstracts
View the call for workshops

The program for the Colloquium is coming together. You can view details of the #CochraneTech Symposium plus several methods courses being offered on day one of the Colloquium. Details of the plenary sessions are coming soon.

 


2015 Dashboard now available

$
0
0
2015 Dashboard now availablemumoquit@cochr…Wed, 03/02/2016 - 17:43
2015 Dashboard

2015 Dashboard is keeping us on track for 2016

Cochrane's Annual Dashboard presents some key metrics on our organizational performance over the previous calendar year. It includes data on Strategy to 2020 target achievements, and key metrics around the four Strategy to 2020 Goals. It’s an excellent tool to use to reflect on what we accomplished in 2015 and the work to be done in 2016.  

View the full 2015 Dashboard.

Read more about Annual and Quarterly Dashboards.

Read more about Strategy to 2020.

Cochrane Justice Health Field and the Cochrane Policy College cease operations

$
0
0
Cochrane Justice Health Field and the Cochrane Policy College cease operations mumoquit@cochr…Thu, 03/03/2016 - 14:10
 Health Field and the Cochrane Policy College cease operations

The Cochrane Justice Health Field and the Cochrane Policy College have ceased operations effective 4 March 2016. An ongoing lack of resource capacity meant that the team were unable to continue to provide a coordinating base and we thank them for all of their hard work. Please direct all enquiries relevant to the Field’s work to the Central Executive team.

Cochrane ‘Trials Search Coordinators’ are now ‘Information Specialists’

$
0
0
Cochrane ‘Trials Search Coordinators’ are now ‘Information Specialists’mumoquit@cochr…Fri, 03/04/2016 - 15:56
Cochrane ‘Trials Search Coordinators’ are now ‘Information Specialists’

Following consultation with current Trials Search Coordinators (TSCs), the Cochrane Steering Group (CSG) has approved the TSCs’ recommendation that their title be changed to ‘Information Specialist’ and the title of Assistant Trials Search Coordinator be changed to ‘Assistant Information Specialist’.


As the job title of TSC is not used outside of Cochrane, its remit is not clear externally. ‘TSC’ also does not encompass either the diverse range of tasks that TSCs perform, or the varied skill sets they bring to the organization.

Bringing the Cochrane role title in line with the wider library and information profession is important for the professional recognition and career progression of current post-holders, and for the future recruitment of suitably qualified and experienced candidates to Cochrane.


This title change is effective across Cochrane as of 1 March 2016. If you have questions about this, please contact Elizabeth Stovold (estovold@sgul.ac.uk) in her capacity as CSG representative for the TSCs/Information Specialists.

Cochrane Priority Reviews list: framework revision 2016

$
0
0
Cochrane Priority Reviews list: framework revision 2016mumoquit@cochr…Mon, 03/07/2016 - 18:56
Cochrane Priority Reviews list: framework revision 2016

In January 2015 the Cochrane Priority Reviews List was launched, and has become a ‘living’ record of Cochrane’s attempt to identify titles that are of greatest importance to our stakeholders and are likely to impact significantly on health outcomes worldwide. Cochrane-wide prioritisation remains an important project and has been included in the Strategy to 2020 Targets for 2016. After the first year of the project we have a better sense of the strengths and weaknesses of our initial framework and believe it is now time to revise it. 

A paper outlining the new framework and submission requirements and a new submission form are available on the CEU website. From March 2016, Cochrane Review Groups that have not undertaken a formal prioritisation process and wish to submit new titles should use this form


Ruth Foxlee, Information Specialist, Cochrane Editorial Unit

David Tovey, Editor in Chief, The Cochrane Library, and Deputy Chief Executive Officer

 

Cochrane editors discuss the results of a recent review

$
0
0
Cochrane editors discuss the results of a recent review mumoquit@cochr…Mon, 03/07/2016 - 19:20
Cochrane editors discuss the results of a recent review

Ovarian cancer is the seventh-most common cancer in women worldwide and has poor survival rates largely attributed to late-stage presentation. Women who have a suspicious ovarian mass without obvious disease outside of the ovary usually require surgery for diagnosis and staging. A new Cochrane Review provides crucial evidence on the accuracy of frozen section analysis, a rapid diagnostic test that can inform management decisions of suspicious ovarian mass during surgery.

Jo Morrison is a Co-ordinating Editor of Cochrane Gynaecological, Neuro-Oncology and Orphan Cancers and Toby Lasserson is a Senior Editor in the Cochrane Editorial Unit. In a new Cochrane Library editorial, they share their opinions on how they think this important review can guide clinical decision making.

Read the Editorial: 'Finding time to make the right decision: using frozen section to inform intra-operative management of suspicious ovarian masses'

Cochrane consultation on governance reform: deadline 18 March

$
0
0
Cochrane consultation on governance reform: deadline 18 Marchnowens@cochrane.orgTue, 03/08/2016 - 03:44
Cochrane consultation on governance reform: deadline 18 March

The Cochrane Steering Group has announced a proposal for the transition to a new governance structure for Cochrane, including a transition from the Steering Group structure to a new Cochrane Governing Board.

This proposal arises from a review of governance that the Steering Group conducted during 2015. Key aims for the new Board include ensuring that its membership reflects Cochrane as an evolving organization and our environment; supporting the Board's role in making decisions on behalf of Cochrane as a whole; opening the membership to bring in external perspectives and valuable skills; and refreshing our electoral procedures.

The current Steering Group believes that the proposed changes will deliver improved governance for Cochrane, while ensuring that Cochrane Groups and contributors retain an active and effective voice in Cochrane's leadership and direction.

Details of the proposal

The Steering Group considered and approved the following paper at its meeting in January 2016 in Vancouver.

Consultation and next steps

All Cochrane Groups and contributors are invited to discuss and have input into the proposed new model.

This proposal will be the subject of thorough discussion by Cochrane’s leadership groups (including the various Group Executives and the Steering Group) at the Mid-Year Meetings in London in April this year. This will include individual Group/Exec meetings as well as a combined strategic session. Ahead of these meetings, we welcome feedback from Cochrane contributors to support our discussions.

Cochrane Group Executives will be leading these discussions and collating feedback among their constituents. All contributors are invited to contribute their feedback through the Execs in this initial phase. In order to feed into the discussions at the Mid-Year Meetings, written feedback from the Execs should be submitted to Miranda Cumpston, Head of Learning and Support at the Cochrane Central Executive by Friday, 18 March

Authors and other individual contributors are also invited to submit feedback directly via this online survey by Friday, 18 March.

All feedback received by this deadline will be collated and made available to all the Execs and the Steering Group ahead of the Mid-Year Meetings. Their detailed discussion will feed into the Steering Group at the end of that week, where a refined proposal for change will be agreed.

This will not be your only chance to have input into the process. Following the Mid-Year Meetings, formal changes to Cochrane's Articles of Association and internal rules of procedure will be drafted. Wide consultation on the proposed model for change will be conducted during the year to ensure that all Cochrane's contributors understand the changes, and that the detailed procedures needed to implement the new governance structure are discussed.

The new governance proposal and changes to the Articles of Association will be proposed for a formal vote of member Groups at the Annual General Meeting at the Seoul Colloquium in October 2016.

While these discussions take place, recruitment has begun to select the new Board's first external members, nominated from outside Cochrane's key contributor groups. These appointments are in accordance with Cochrane's existing Articles of Association, and the Steering Group expects important benefits to be gained by bringing external perspective and additional experience into the group.

Timeline

16 Feb - 17 March Initial consultation led by Group Execs
18 March Deadling for initial feedback
19 March - 1 April Initial feedback circulated to CSG and Group Execs
4-5 April Mid-Year Meetings of Execs & Co-ordinating Editors Board
5 April Strategic Session on governance reform
6-8 April CSG Meeting to finalise proposal for change
11 April - mid-September Consultation on detailed proposal for change
24-27 October Seoul Colloquium. Final vote on proposal at AGM.

 

 

Apply to the Cochrane Review Support Programme

$
0
0
Apply to the Cochrane Review Support Programmemumoquit@cochr…Mon, 03/07/2016 - 19:59
Apply to the Cochrane Review Support Programme

We are pleased to announce that the second funding round of a one-year pilot of the Cochrane Review Support Programme is now open.

Key features of the programme:

  • All Cochrane Review Groups may apply for the awards.
  • Groups may nominate no more than two titles – either new reviews or review updates – from the November 2015 revision of the Cochrane Priority Review List. Titles added to the list after Nov 2015 cannot be proposed for this funding round.
  • 10 grants of £5,000 each will be awarded
  • We will aim to decide the list of successful reviews and to have notified the applicants by mid-June 2016
  • Reviews must be published a maximum of 13 months after the awards are notified

 

Cochrane recognizes that these awards are insufficient to meet the full costs of conducting reviews; rather, they are intended to facilitate and possibly accelerate publication of high priority reviews that are already planned or underway.

Applications close at 5pm GMT, Friday 6 May 2016. An application form can be found on the Cochrane Review Support Programme page on the CEU website.


Colorectal Cancer Group seeks experienced editors

$
0
0
Colorectal Cancer Group seeks experienced editorsnowens@cochrane.orgTue, 03/08/2016 - 06:11
Colorectal Cancer Group seeks experienced editors

The Colorectal Cancer Group (CRCG) is seeking new editors to join its Editorial Board. Applicants should have broad methodological experience and expertise, including in the application of the GRADE process for evaluating certainty in relation to a body of evidence. Experience, knowledge and skills relating to gastrointestinal surgery or oncology are also highly desirable. The CRCG requires experienced editors, so all applicants must have completed at least two Cochrane Reviews as a review author. Editorial experience is desirable but not essential.

For complete information about this role and how to apply, please see the full Call for Applications.

 

New webinar series - Learning Live

$
0
0
New webinar series - Learning Livemumoquit@cochr…Tue, 03/08/2016 - 20:16
Learning Live explores ways to involve consumers

Cochrane Learning Live is a new series of free monthly webinars aimed at anyone interested in learning skills or gaining knowledge and experience relating to Cochrane activities.  The series is managed by Cochrane’s Learning and Support Department. You can learn what topics are planned, watch videos of past webinars and find information aboout presenting here.

Next in the series is 'Consumers for the Terrified – exploring new ways of involving consumers in the work of Cochrane' on 12 April. Topics will include new ways of getting consumers involved and the latest news about the Cochrane Membership Scheme, the Cochrane Crowd/Citizen Science project, Task Exchange and Cochrane Training. This webinar would be of interest to review authors, Managing Editors, Co-ordinating Editors, Cochrane Centre staff, consumers, and anyone interested in exploring ways of increasing the participation of consumers in the work of Cochrane. You can sign-up for this free webinar here

 

 

 

 

Cochrane Translations: Cochrane Kompakt

$
0
0
Cochrane Translations: Cochrane Kompaktmumoquit@cochr…Wed, 03/09/2016 - 20:02
Cochrane Translations: Cochrane Kompakt

‘Cochrane Kompakt,’ the German translation project, is a joint effort between Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Austria, and Cochrane Switzerland. Cordula Braun, from the Department of Physiotherapy at hochschule 21 in Germany, gave a presentation on a collaboration between German physiotherapists and the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group to translate and disseminate physiotherapy-related Cochrane Reviews at the Cochrane Colloquium in Vienna, and shares their story here now.

Blog

Our team of German physiotherapists has been translating plain language summaries (PLS) of relevant new and updated Reviews in the area of physiotherapy, as well as contributing to the wider German translation project since 2014. In a joint project with the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group (BJMT), we translated 10 PLS of their Reviews. Our aim was to examine and document the translation process in order to provide feedback to the Review Group, and to enhance dissemination of the BJMT Reviews.

We translated the selected BJMT Reviews with input from a native English advisor, and involved at least two translators per PLS. We documented feedback using a form with pre-determined questions. In addition to the German version of cochrane.org, and the Cochrane Library, the translations were co-published in the largest German-language physiotherapy journal, PT – Zeitschrift für Physiotherapeuten. The translation work was funded by Cochrane BJMT.

 

The Feedback and audit form:

Audit

 

Lessons Learnt:

  • Our collaboration between Review Group and a translation team of health professionals allowed translators to discuss questions about the PLS directly with the Review Group, and to give feedback on topics and potential improvements to PLS.
  • It allowed us to audit our own translation process in terms of time and processes.
  • It helped get findings from relevant Reviews to non-English speaking health professionals and enhanced the dissemination of their Reviews in general.

 

To learn more, please email cordula_braun@gmx.de

Remembering Andrew Herxheimer

$
0
0
Remembering Andrew Herxheimermumoquit@cochr…Tue, 03/08/2016 - 19:27
Remembering Andrew Herxheimer

Reposted, with permission, from Cochrane Methods.

 

Blog

It was with deep sadness that the Cochrane Adverse Effects Methods Group said goodbye to Andrew Herxheimer, a founding member of The Cochrane Collaboration and the Adverse Effects Methods Group.

If it had not been for Andrew, the Adverse Effects Methods Group would never have existed. Andrew was a pioneer in so many ways. His passion for patients as an important and authentic source of information was ahead of its time. There is much opportunity (and need) to learn from patients in many parts of health care, including patient safety; Andrew taught us the importance of seeking the patient voice.

Andrew was also a truly amazing man. An inspiration to many; we have all got something to thank Andrew for there. He was always helpful, and the multitude of Tweets and Facebook messages show how Andrew touched so many people's lives. Andrew was also noted by his acute perception of science and life. He was one of these rare special people who can genuinely share wisdom, and he will be sorely missed. 

Andrew

The Convenors of the Cochrane Adverse Effects Methods Group would like to thank Andrew for his dedication and commitment to the Cochrane Adverse Effects Methods Group. Ten days before his death, he managed to meet the group in a teleconference to discuss projects and future plans.

Andrew

A web page is available for people to express condolences, recount memories, and share photographs.

This is the last memory we will keep from Andrew, active, kind and interested, attending the most recent Cochrane Colloquium in Vienna (2015):  Andrew and the youngest Convenor of the Cochrane Adverse Effects Methods Group, Daniela.

Andrew

 

Cochrane maintains status as NGO in official relations with WHO

$
0
0
Cochrane maintains status as NGO in official relations with WHOmumoquit@cochr…Wed, 03/09/2016 - 16:38
Cochrane maintains status as NGO in official relations with WHO

The World Health Organization (WHO) Executive Board, during its meeting in January 2016, decided to maintain Cochrane’s status as a non-governmental organization (NGO) in official relations with the WHO. Our report of activities for 2013-2015 and our plan of work for 2016-2018 (reported on earlier here) were both approved. 

This WHO decision is important. Cochrane’s official relation status allows us to attend, as an observer, a range of WHO meetings, and facilitates all other interactions with WHO.

We would like to thank you all once again for your continuing commitment and engagement in working with WHO, through your various Cochrane activities and roles.

Your suggestions to further strengthen our relation with WHO are most welcome. We would also like to know about your engagements with WHO – in meetings, expert groups, or other projects – allowing us to build on all existing connections in making the most of this strategic partnership. 

Sylvia de Haan, Partnerships Co-ordinator, Communications and External Affairs

 

Viewing all 1155 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images